Heartland Boy

Seriously Singaporean Financial Literacy

MENUMENU
  • About
  • Investment
    • Investment
      • REITS
      • Singapore Stocks
      • Singapore Property
      • Cryptocurrency
    • banner-woolworths-office

      At What Share Price Would I Be A Buyer Of AIMS APAC REIT?

      August 12, 2023 By Alison_Liew 2 Comments

    • rookie

      Rookie Investment Mistakes I Made When I Was A Beginner Investor 10 Years Ago

      posted in Investment, Singapore Stocks

    • hdb-bto-classification

      New HDB BTO Classification Framework, What Are The Possible Consequences?

      posted in Investment, Singapore Property

  • Banking & Insurance
    • Banking & Insurance
      • Bank Deposits
      • Bank Loans
      • Credit Card
      • Insurance
    • gxs-348

      Is GXS 3.48% Interest Rate Promotion The Shortest Ever In Singapore?

      posted in Bank Deposits, Banking & Insurance

    • scb-simply-cash-credit-card

      SCB replaces its unlimited cashback card with the simply cash credit card- here’s my review

      posted in Banking & Insurance, Credit Card

    • cancer-drug-list

      How Integrated Shield Plans’ downgrade from as charged to 5X of Medishield Life’s limit for cancer treatments affect you

      posted in Banking & Insurance, Insurance

  • Retirement
    • Retirement
      • Singapore CPF
      • Singapore SRS
      • Taxes
    • matt-bennett-78hTqvjYMS4-unsplash

      Getting down to some common misconceptions CPF LIFE

      posted in Retirement, Singapore CPF

    • invest srs

      Why Invest Your SRS Funds In ETF

      posted in Retirement, Singapore SRS

    • gst-increase

      Beat The GST Sales Campaigns Brought Out Some Irrational Financial Decisions

      January 29, 2023 By Alison_Liew Leave a Comment

  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
      • Dining
      • Travel
      • Parenthood
      • Wedding
      • Others
    • review-of-mealpal-singapore-that-now-serves-hawker-food

      Review of MealPal Singapore That Now Serves Hawker Food

      posted in Dining, Lifestyle

    • My family holiday to Australia’s Brisbane, Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast

      posted in Lifestyle, Travel

    • customised-baby-cake-lenora

      How We Celebrated Lenora’s 100-Day Baby Shower In 2023

      posted in Lifestyle, Parenthood

  • Resources
  • Contact

Investment REITS

Compare CDL Hospitality Trust and Far East Hospitality Trust

oasia-downtown-grand-copthorne-waterfront-hotel

In what is a rather muted economic performance for Singapore in 2023 thus far, one sector that is shining brightly is tourism. Not only have tourist arrivals recovered to two-thirds of pre-Covid-19 numbers in the first quarter of 2023, tourists also spent more per trip in what was a case of revenge spending. This got me interested to analyze how tourist dollars will trickle down to benefit tourism-related stocks listed on the SGX. Immediately, the likes of SIA and Genting came to the fore with their strong branding. In the end, I decided to revert to my comfort zone, REITs.

top-gainers-movers-moomoo

Diagram 1: Top gainers and movers (Source: moomoo)

Both CDL Hospitality Trust (‘CDLHT’) and Far East Hospitality Trust (‘FEHT’) are amongst the top 5 movers under the REITs category in 2022 as shown in Diagram 1. Let’s find out if hospitality Trusts have more legs to run. This blog post compares CDL Hospitality Trust and Far East Hospitality Trust across various key metrices.

1) Dividend Yield

Since I am reviewing REITs, the first metric for comparison would be its dividend yield since investors typically buy REITs for long-term dividends. With reference to Diagram 2, Far East Hospitality Trust offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 5.21% while CDL Hospitality Trust comes in at 4.29%.

compare-feht-cdlht-dividend-yield

Diagram 2: Compare dividend yield TTM for CDLHT and FEHT

At first glance, it appears that FEHT is superior than CDLHT in terms of dividend yield. However, this does not tell the whole picture as trailing twelve months reflects the Distribution Per Stapled Security (‘DPS’) that was declared in 2022. If 2H2022’s DPS was annualized instead, the respective dividend yield for FEHT and CDLHT would be similar at 6.0%. For FEHT, 2022 DPS included partial divestment gains resulting from the sale of Central Square. On the other hand, I note that a larger share of CDLHT’s portfolio are under management contracts compared to FEHT as shown in Diagram 3 and 4.

cdlht-master-lease-managed

Diagram 3: Breakdown of master lease vs managed properties for CDLHT’s properties

cdlht-business-model

Diagram 4: Breakdown of CDLHT’s revenue

Diagram 4 shows the earnings report of CDLHT from moomoo app. When read in conjunction with Diagram 3, it is evident that 56% of CDLHT’s revenue come from management contracts. This suggests that as tourism tailwinds continue to blow, there may be more upside for CDLHT since a larger proportion of its revenue is variable.

Do you know that when you earn dividends from your investment, that dividend will be deposited into your Moomoo SG universal account? The ex-dividend date and dividend payout date can also be found in Detailed Quotes > Summary tab in the Moomoo app.

Winner: CDLHT

2) Price-to-Book Ratio

A lower Price to Book (‘P/B’) ratio suggests that the REIT is trading at a bigger discount to its true value. As shown in Diagram 5, the P/B ratio of CDLHT and FEHT are 0.82 and 0.66 respectively.

cdlht-feht-price-book-ratio-compare

Diagram 5: Price to book ratio analysis for CDLHT and FEHT

However, such a comparison is too simplistic. Rather, I prefer to analyse the REIT’s current PB ratio relative to its historical average which is denoted by the grey line in Diagram 5. It is evident that both trusts are almost trading at their historical valuation although FEHT is probably just slightly under. Therefore, there is potential capital upside for FEHT if it manages to revert to its historical P/B valuation.

Winner: FEHT

3) Ownership by Sponsor and Manager

I am curious to know why there is such a disparity in P/B valuation of these 2 hospitality trusts. There could be a couple of reasons – both tangible and intangible. As shown in Diagram 6, CDLHT has a larger float which leads to higher daily trading volume. In addition, its market capitalisation is also larger than FEHT.

compare-feht-cdlht-trading-volume

Diagram 6: Trading volumes for CDLHT and FEHT

This is confirmed by Diagram 7 which reveals the top shareholders of each trust.

feht-cdlht-ownership-manager

Diagram 7: Shareholding for CDLHT and FEHT

CLDHT is 31% owned by Sponsor and Manager while FEHT is 52% owned by Sponsor and Manager. At more than 30%, I feel that there is strong alignment of interests and both Sponsors would want to ensure that their respective trusts perform well for security holders.

Winner: FEHT

4) Debt to Asset Ratio

Given the high interest rate environment, extra attention must be paid to how the Managers navigate the capital markets. We have seen how financing costs have significantly reduced the distributable income of some REITs which were caught off-guard by the rapid increase in interest rates by Fed.

cdlht-feht-capital-markets-compare

Diagram 8: Capital Markets Performance of CDLHT and FEHT

As shown in Diagram 8, CDLHT and FEHT’s gearing ratio are 37.5% and 32% respectively. I consider this as very healthy as there is significant buffer from the 50% gearing limit set by MAS.

Winner: FEHT

5) Interest Coverage Ratio

Both Trusts report interest coverage ratio of around 3.5X. I find this to be rather low as I think a higher margin of safety should be 5X. This should gradually increase in the near term as tourism receipts grow.

Winner: Draw

6) Fixed Debt

CDLHT has 55% of its debt on fixed interest rate while FEHT has 47% of its debt fixed. Since I hold the view that interest rates may decrease in the near to mid term, I would prefer a REIT which has a smaller proportion of its debt on fixed interest rates at the current investment climate.

Winner: FEHT

Conclusion

I have summarised my verdict of this comparison between CDLHT and FEHT over the 6 financial metrics in Diagram 9.

metrics-feht-cdlht-summary-heartland-boy

Diagram 9: Heartland Boy compares CDLHT and FEHT

Under the current macro-economic environment, I would priortize safety and conservatism and that is why FEHT would be my preferred choice. However, investors with higher risk appetite may prefer CDLHT since there is a possibility of a growing DPS since a larger proportion of its hotels under management contracts.

If hospitality trusts are not your cup of tea, you may get inspiration from the top most traded SG stocks that can be easily found on the moomoo mobile app (Diagram 10).

sg-stocks-top-traded-moomoo

Diagram 10: Step-by-step guide to discover the top most traded SG stocks via moomoo app

-Sponsor’s Message-

Currently, Moomoo SG is offering $0* commission on SG stock trading which both new users & qualified existing users qualify for. This makes Moomoo SG the lowest SG stock trading fee brokerage in town due the promo period. In addition, Moomoo SG also offers free level 1 real-time quotes for Singapore Stocks, ETFs and REITs! Even after the end of the promotional period, Moomoo SG’s commission per order is still competitively priced, from 0.03% of the transaction amount. Platform and other fees apply.

Click on the link below to sign up today.

singapore-marketThis article is published on 24 June 2023

Disclaimer: All views expressed in the article are the independent opinion of Heartland Boy. Neither Moomoo Singapore or its affiliates shall be liable for the content of the information provided. It does not constitute and investment advice, an offer or solicitation to subscribe for, purchase or sell the investment product(s) mentioned herein.

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore


9 Comments

« Hi World, Meet Lenora Liew
CPF Changes in 2023 That You Must Take Note Of »

Comments

  1. Vince says

    June 25, 2023 at 9:20 am

    Wow, been a long time since your previous REIT post. Agree that FEHT is safer at this moment.

    Reply
    • Alison_Liew says

      June 25, 2023 at 2:05 pm

      Thanks Vince. Indeed its been a while but comments like yours gives me encouragement to keep going!

      Reply
      • Vince says

        June 25, 2023 at 3:10 pm

        Nice, we bloggers must keep encouraging each other. Looking fwd you future REIT post.

        Reply
  2. Henry says

    June 25, 2023 at 12:05 pm

    Hi HB
    New to this. What are master lease and managed properties? How do they work?

    Reply
    • Alison_Liew says

      June 25, 2023 at 2:05 pm

      Hi Henry,

      Generally, Master Lease properties are leased out for a fixed fee (say $x) to a single tenant. After paying the landlord $x, the tenant gets to pocket the remaining revenue collected.

      On the other hand, Managed properties are managed by an operator for a fee. The Landlord pays the operator $Y to manage his property. After the Landlord pays the operator $Y, the landlord gets to pocket the remaining revenue collected.

      I want to caveat that this is the difference between Managed and Master lease in its simplest form. The truth is that is probably a hybrid of both in most contracts.

      Reply
  3. Aisamo says

    June 25, 2023 at 2:44 pm

    You should also read carefully the contract of the REIT itself. Concerning FE, the REIT is NOT owning the RE, it is merely given an economic rigth for a fairly short period (about 30-40 years, from memory). So you should retreat some part of the div as a straigth cap. reimb. Then the picture is not that fantastic.

    Reply
    • Alison_Liew says

      June 25, 2023 at 9:00 pm

      Hi,
      I guess you are referring to the Master Lease. It is typically set at 20+20 years, with the option to renew at the option of the Master Lessee (who is the sponsor in this case). At the worst case scenario of a non-renewal, the REIT can find a manager to manage the properties on its behalf.

      I did a quick scan of the prospectus and annual report and based on the structure of FEHT, I am pretty sure the REIT+Trust own the properties.

      Reply
      • Aisamo says

        June 26, 2023 at 1:21 am

        NO, I do not means Master Lease. I mean the initial purchase of Hotels from FE Orchad (at the very start of the FEHT ). If you read the contract, FE Orchard only sells a economic right of 50 years to the REIT- a sort of economic leasehold of 50 years, if you will. After this initial purchase, the REIT may have purchased other hotels, in a more clear and “normal” way.

        Reply
        • Alison_Liew says

          June 26, 2023 at 2:40 pm

          Hi Aisamo,

          Thanks for pointing it out. I went to read the prospectus 1 more time and I finally found what you are referring to. You are right that the REIT only owns a 50-year leasehold on Orchard Parade Hotel. It is the only anomaly as the rest of the properties are between 65-81 year leases, which averages out to 70+ year leasehold.

          Some sort of discount is perhaps warranted for the Orchard Parade hotel while for the rest, they seem pretty standard and aligned to the lease u will get if u buy an old hotel on a 99-year lease. Although there was a couple of hotels in Orchard which the vendor has freehold titles, but again selling a shorter lease is the usual game that developers play.

          Thanks for highlighting this as it helps to sharpens my analysis.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to Heartlandboy.com

Hello there, I am Heartland Boy! I am always thinking about how I can improve my financial literacy in order to achieve financial independence. This is the place to be if you are hungry for financial independence (sometimes good hawker food as well) and foolish enough to believe in the musings of Heartland Boy. Read More…

  • About Heartland Boy
  • Contact
  • Work With Us
  • Privacy Policy
As Seen On

Copyright © 2023 Heartland Boy · All Rights Reserved
All content expressed herein are the personal opinions of Heartland Boy and does not constitute the views of any company nor as professional financial advice.

Copyright © 2023 · Divine Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in